Scotland’s Childrens Hearing System

Scotland’s Childrens Hearing System

Scotland’s Childrens Hearing System is said to be Scotland’s Jewel in the Crown, lets examine this statement?

According to the Scottish Government and its partners, the Childrens Hearing system in Scotland is the “Jewel in the Crown” and is a very fair system.

If that is so, why are there 11317 in care in Scotland and not at home? Why are there about another 4000 children under the control of the Childrens Hearing system in Scotland.

Maybe the Scottish Government can explain why number of children in the system jumped by 60% between 2001 ( a few years after they came to power) and 2016?

Is it because just about everything to do with Childrens
Hearings and being taken into care is because the mothers are supposedly responsible for everything and some fathers can walk on water in the eyes of the practitioners of child protection?

Is it because the system only operates on opinion, suspicion and supposition. Evidence is ignored and the whole system works on a theory that “something may happen to a child in the future”?

The level of “evidence” required within the child protection system is lower than for a criminal court. Why is that? If a child is being taken into care should the mother/parents not expect a higher standard as they are in fact being accused of threatening abuse and or negligence towards the children, a criminal offence in Scotland.

When a social worker or a health official applies to a Sheriff for a Child Protection Order to enable them to remove a child from its home, the submission is not made under oath. Why a lower standard of law when a decision is being made to remove a child from its family maybe for a period of up to 18 years?

The system does so much for the children within it that the Children and Young Persons Commissioner for Scotland states on the official web site:-

*Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland***

*Why corporate parenting matters*


Children and young people who are care experienced or looked after have the poorest outcomes of all children and young people in Scotland.Evidence suggests that:

* 50% of the adult prison population were looked after
* 30% of looked after children become homeless
* 50% of looked after children have a mental health issue
* 4% of care leavers go onto higher education

Corporate parenting as a concept exists to try and improve these
outcomes, and to improve the level of respect people have for the rights of care experienced and looked after children and young people.

He fails to state that at least 25% of girls become pregnant by the age of 19 years, 25% are homless between 16 and 25 years of age. Also fails to say that you have a 20 times higher chance of dying by the age of 25 years.

The statistics from the Government show 19% of children now taken into care are under the age of 5 years. 70% of them are adopted, mostly against the wishes of the parents.

A Petition has been lodged with the Scottish Parliaments Public
Petitions Committee calling for an independent QC led investigation in of all aspects of Child Protection in Scotland. Full details of the
Petition plus the transcript of the submission to Petition Committee
can be found at The

Governments response to the Petition can also be read from that link.
Anybody can make a response to the Governments submission by 12th March, 2018, by sending an email to

If you have found yourself in this mess and no-one else can help you, perhaps you can get help from the Scottish A-Team, Dadscare oremail them at


Children’s Panels Not Fit For Purpose

Children’s Panels Not Fit For Purpose.

Children’s Panels Not Fit For Purpose because panel members are on the most part blinded by Social Work Mambo, Jumbo!

Children’s Panels Not Fit For Purpose, many panel members in recent years has left the service, most panel members that have stayed has an inbuilt bias against parents and a strong belief that social workers can do nothing wrong even if proven to be out and out pork piers,

The other massive problem for most hard pressed parents is the sheer amount of paperwork that comes along with each hearing that even the best solicitors find hard to cope with.

Then we have the biggest headache of all, panel member changes, many panel members don’t turn up on time or if at all, anyone reading this might say so what, well its easy to get another in but they wont be reading the case notes only listening which is no use to man and or beast.

You can request the same panel members yet no-one tells anyone or the parents about this even most solicitors are unaware of these regulations!

Most panel members are terrified to go against SW child plan recommendations in case of something happening afterwards even though there can be severe multiple problems in the look after child’s placement which means in most part they are there to rubber stamp SW teams plans.

The best a parent can hope for if they can prove the social workers are negligent is to get the panel members to agree to order a safe guarders report which loos at both parties and issues damming reports which even then if against SW is an almost complete waste of time.

Social Work only cares about one thing and that’s keeping children in care, some local authorities has such a low return to parent care it seems they have a hidden agenda to not even consider it as an option going forward.

There is big business out there in the form of fostering agencies, its not in their financial interests to have children returned home after long-term placements have broken down so they advice their employees to play dirty and make sure they have the final word to children’s panels to make sure children stay in the system and little chance of returning to the parents by just making it up as they go along, most use it as an excuse for the placement breaking down and no-fault on their parts.

Children’s panels can except any information from any source by-passing the SW team all together, this information is not checked by anyone and can paint a parent as a pedophile without recourse but enough to stain ones character in the eyes of the panel members not to return children to their parents, this must not be allowed to continue and is against natural justice and the parents human rights and then becomes part of the child’s care-first record no matter what!

Most panels don’t read the entire file, in big cases this might take 200+ hours so they only look at snapshots of the latest information which is totally unfair to the children and their parents and SW teams know this and play on it!

The biggest problem with panels is SW abuse of power you easily know if the SW team is in case file trouble they come in mob handed sometimes over 15 different professionals will appear on the day and then totally command the entire proceedings not allowing the parents to question or debate anything with the end result a win for SW.

Most people reading this will say but there’s a children’s reporter there surely not, most reporters are brilliant and stop SW from going to far or doing anything illegal but controlling who speaks next or how long is not one of their jobs?

SW knows the game they do it nearly every day, solicitors are uselessly rubbish in these proceedings.

The main game SW play is breaking the family bonds they do this by keeping the kids in-care for as long as possible and trying everything to stop family contact, this is easier to get the children to think their parents no-longer want them and make the transition into permanency (parents losing their parental rights forever) and the children’s panels is used whether they admit it or not to rubber stamp SW plans to stop contact for some the most bizarre reasons anyone can imagine!

Why does no-one talk about the above, simple, stigma! No one wants to shout SW took my kids away and SW plays on this fact but if any parent wishes to talk about their story we will connect you to the only charity that openly challenges SW abuse, please email spammers beware!


In London they are trying a new way, judges take on a case stay with it the entire time and the results are over 70% of children are returned home and stay there this would stop dodgy social workers from making up stories and total fabrications and if nothing else level the playing field for parents and their children.

In Scotland you can appeal decisions but only 3 days afterwards and most decisions are mot substantive but basically 21 day continuance orders which means SW plans are continuing as planned……


Go to the SW OFFICE OR COMPLAINTS and ask for a SAR subject to access request this details all information on the care first records of your children in care, learn what SW knows but to scared to tell you or children’s panel members!

Children’s Panels Not Fit For Purpose and needs to be more transparent and legally fair and appeals should be judge lead from in house and heard within 7 days!



Scottish Government Running Scared of SSSC charities asking ministers for a meeting to discuss ongoing severe cases of not investigating MOP complaints.

For whatever reasons ministers have for over protecting the workings of the SSSC are hundreds of Members of the Public are seemingly beeen denied justice and out of over 800 complaints in the last 3 years only 3 have been upheld after Dadscare requested an Freedom of information request.

They also found out there was 2500 complaints by employers for the same period and nearly 17% were upheld which proves the service is not for users of the service but only for the employers, perhaps to get rid of employees without having to pay anything at all?

That works out at 425 upheld complaints, 1 in every 141 member of the public complaints upheld over that of the interests of the employers perhaps the Scottish Government is fully aware of such a terrible stastic and terrified of meeting Dadscare teams face to face?

Scottish Government Running Scared, it seems so but why?


More info on this thread here~

Derek McInnes Must Go

Derek McInnes Must Go.


Derek McInnes Must Go, he said no to Sunderland and got a better deal, is he waiting to turn down Rangers for an even better deal to stay at Aberdeen?

Derek McInnes Must Go and the sooner the better, the players are struggling with will he won’t he mentality and just before the Rangers manager got sacked the Aberdeen manager was busy signing up the players with add-on contracts yet won’t commit to the club himself shows hes perhaps a greedy not to be trusted manager and makes the case for himself that he must go!

The Must Go case makes the Aberdeen board look really silly now in their attempts to move to kingswells must now be in serious doubt as they built their entire case on giving Derek McInnes the tools to succeed, well if he goes whats the point of the move at all?

Derek McInnes Must Go because deep down he really wants the rangers job, if that’s not true he should just come out and say so after all he is contracted to Aberdeen for another 3 years and the Aberdeen board should say hes not for sale at any cost but won’t which means, Derek McInnes Must Go!

More on the stupid move away from the current home of the dons here.


Mark McDonald, MSP Resigns

Mark McDonald, MSP  Resigns

Mark McDonald, MSP Resigns for Aberdeen Donside, said he was stepping down from his role as childcare and early years minister.

He apologised and said his attempts to be “humourous” or “friendly” may have led others to become uncomfortable.

He is one of two SNP members currently being investigated by the party over possible misconduct.

It is understood the allegations against him are not criminal in nature. The other complaint being investigated by the SNP does not relate to a parliamentarian.

In a statement he said: “It has been brought to my attention that some of my previous actions have been considered to be inappropriate – where I have believed myself to have been merely humorous or attempting to be friendly, my behavior might have made others uncomfortable or led them to question my intentions.

“My behavior is entirely my responsibility and I apologise unreservedly to anyone I have upset or who might have found my behavior inappropriate.

“In light of my position in government, I believe it would not be appropriate for me to continue to serve in my role in the Scottish government at this time and I have tendered my resignation as a minister.

“I hope that in taking this step neither any particular woman or my family will be the focus of undue and unwarranted scrutiny.

“It has been an honor to serve in the Scottish government and I will continue to serve my constituents in Aberdeen Donside to the best of my ability.”

Well that’s what he has said but last week he refused to meet one of his constituents who had on-going problems with Aberdeen Social Work claiming he could not meet with them because of his role a Children’s minister.

We understand he also refused to meet the local charity Dadscare who wished to ask him why he refused to meet with them over their FOI request that stated that less than 1% of the 809 members of the public complaints into social services were upheld and 21% of employer complaints were also upheld showing the SSSC as not being fit for purpose of which he has responsibility!

More on this here.



Three Customer Service Complaints team are the pits, Three has lost the focus of customer and instead push new mobile contracts that are not wanted.

My wife was the victim of this latest attempt by three network to push their ESSENTIAL PACKAGE because over a 2 year deal they make more profit even though customers dont want it!

My wife was a loyal customer of several years and point blank refused to take on this Essential plan because it was a bad deal and compared to the advanced plan where her data was a personal hotspot three point blank refused to offer their online advanced plan telling her she was CRAZY to even ask for it and she was silly to even think about it?

It proves they don’t care about keeping loyal customers instead of profit margins, when my wife stated VIRGIN MOBILE HAD BETTER DEALS they stated VIRGIN uses a third party for services yes thats true but its true 4G not the crap 3G service we get in rural Scotland.

I listened to the 3 seperate calls to THREE CUSTOMER SERVICE COMPLAINTS TEAM and they were so rude and dismissive Three really can’t afford to leave their business to a third party Idia call centre?

Three has lost me this year after 9 years to the same sharp practices where they lied to me just to get me off unlimited data which was shameful and no matter how long you have been with them you wont get a reduction in price although they like to tell you “YOU HAVE BEEN SUCH A GREAT CUSTOMER” it means nothing, just empty words by THREE CUSTOMER SERVICE COMPLAINTS.

My wife now has a shiny S8 at £29, 14 quid cheaper than Three and £79 kept in her purse three networksgreat loss.





That’s the BBC guilty again at getting the story all wrong by claimig cars older then 2006 faces the new daily charge.

Its got nothing to do with the age it’s all about whether the Diesel car you own or drive has a DPF installed or not, not it’s age?

A diesel particulate filter (or DPF) is a device designed to remove diesel particulate matter or soot from the exhaust gas of a diesel engine.

BBC said on Monday morning if your Diesel car is older than 2006 you will have to pay not true I have a 2005 CLK 2.1D and my car is exempt?



Best Green Energy Deal

Best Green Energy Deal

Best Green Energy Deal, click picture to get your instant £50 cashback.

Best Green Energy Deal, if your paying over £1800 in duel fuel tarrifs you can save over £600 and get our exclusive £50 cashback deal by using our link.

The Best Green Energy Deal is here and because its based on greener generation its the only form of power thats getting cheaper to produce as oil and gas has increased in costs over the last five years, its never been a better time to go greener for your energy needs.

The benefits of joining the Best Green Energy Deal is as follows.

Energy example for a TWO BEDROOM FLAT EQUALS £57pcm FOR BOTH ELECTRICITY AND GAS combined.
Best Green Energy Deal the facts.
⭐ 1 tariff policy with 2 price decreases in last year.
⭐ Bulb will pay any exit fees up to £120 from your existing supplier. Switch to Bulb in just 21 days.
⭐ Customer service is UK based.
⭐ Electricity is 100% renewable, Gas 10%, so cleaner for our environment.
⭐ Market leading prices. Taking into account, referral sign up’s for you each time you refer, you receive £50 credit to your energy account in 21 days, the second cheapest energy supplier the cheapest is £30 more per year but wants you to pay upfront equal to 2 monthly payments and huge exit fees.
⭐ Sign up from 3 minutes with regular contact from bulb during your very own switch.
⭐ No exit fees if you wish to leave bulb. Also, bulb provide 31 days notice if it is to change tariff.
⭐ Bulb have a £30 dual fuel discount per annum.
⭐ If you have never changed utility companies before it really is so simple, pop your details in the pre populated fields, give your meter readings after 16 days and that is it. No need to contact your existing supplier, bulb do it for you!
To get you started and to get your £50 casback click this link and get the Best Green Energy Deal.



Trump IQ test fake news, everyone knows Donald Trump is as smart as a dumb ass here in Scotland and his line of I am smarter than everyone else is fake news.

Trump IQ test fake news, we know it is because on his twitter feed the guy who says hes the smartest in the room cant even spell correctly?

We challange this dumb ass to a proper mensa test held in public with Rexy boy and our money is on Rexy!

Trump is thick as mince he once took us to WIPO spent a fortune trying to steal a domain name from us in 2006, spent a small fortune and then just when he thought the job was done we rented it for another 10 years before it was transfered to him which meant he owned it but could not use it, yes he’s got a high IQ not?

If he’s so smart why is he surrounded by smarter people than him this must make him have an inferiority complex everytime he wakes up.

The truth is hes a dumb ass and its his own personal ego that’s bigger than anyones IQ by a country mile, he cant sack Rex because he knows hes boss is a dumb ass with a very low IQ and that really the Trump IQ test is fake news.

SSSC Not Fit For Purpose

SSSC Not Fit For Purpose.

SSSC Not Fit For Purpose as stated by Scotland’s leading Dads Charity, Dadscare based in Aberdeen, Scotland.

SSSC not fit for purpose, the case;

Dadscare has recently made a bold move to denounce the workings of the SSSC in public by stating the SSSC is not fit for purpose.

They state it’s a waste of time or next to a waste of time for members of the public to make any sort of complaint as they are seem to be simply not interested no matter what level of evidence one produces.

The charity thinks as do many other third sector organisations that the SSSC is only there for the employers if they are looking for a scapegoat as seems to be the case in a recent removal from the register in Fife.

If one looks at SSSC case files and the actual complaint details it’s clear the information could only come from the workers employers.

Dadscare has stated they have made what they believe to be very serious complaints against Social Workers in Aberdeen and Dundee childrens social services.

Just about everyone in Scottish media has heard rumours of what other professionals thinks about childrens services in the northeast of Scotland.

UPDATE, SSSC pulls the link for members of the public to report concerns about registered workers, why now?

SSSC Not Fit For Purpose


One other factor for all politicians that likes to read such things, the SSSC has a charter to print money every social worker has to pay £80 per year just to keep their jobs, if you dont pay your fees you dont work which could be why they discourage members of the public from filing complaints.

If word got out to the general population there was a body that could tackle dodgy Social workers then the service would get inundated because lets face it most end users don’t have a clue the SSSC is there for them most have never even heard of the SSSC because most dodgy Social workers wont ever tell their clients how to complain or even who to complain too, they just hope your to dumb to notice and that’s another reason the SSSC Not Fit For Purpose.

One of the biggest problems is if a member of the public puts in a complaint they are very rarely told the outcome of the investigations, how can that be described as fully transparent, the Scottish Goverment needs to intervene and make it more a opem process?

Link to Scotlands only charity that chalanges social workers on a daily basis to always act in a professional and hounerable way, where their reports are balanced and fair and where father parental assessments are required one will be carried out!


Dadsacre recently recieved a complaint reply from the SSSC about an Aberdeen Social Worker they formally complained about and they stated “It may have been a breach of CODES OF PRACTICE but it does no impair on the workers fitness to practice.”

What so whats the point of brand new and very strong SSSC CODES OF PRACTICE makes no sense to us either and they had to wait 4 months to be told this.

The charity Dadscare was so concerned they request a freedom of information into how many charity complaints were upheld by members of the public, the result was amazing in the last 3 years there was 235 complaints made and only 2.15% complaints upheld against registered workers that was 5.025 yes a worker with a foot missing, that’s really accrete recording of the figures, not!

Dear Sir/Madam
In reply to your request for information received on 18 September 2017, please see
our response to your questions below.
1/ How many fitness to practice complaints has been received in past 3 years from
either a) members of the public, b) third sector, c) employers?
a. In the period between 18 September 2014 and 18 September 2017 we received 235 complaints from members of the public (MOPs). 96 of these complaints are still under investigation.
b. Of the 235 MOP complaints, 10 were from organisations in the third sector
c. In the period between 18 September 2014 and 18 September 2017 we received 3575 complaints from employers (3459 from current employers and 116 from previous employers). 1014 of these complaints are still under investigation.
Of the 3575 complaints from employers 818 were from organisations in the third sector.
2/ What percentage of complaints received from these 3 separate groups have been upheld over the last 3 years?
a. Of the MOP complaints we have concluded investigating, 2.15% have resulted in
a sanction being imposed on the worker’s registration
b. Of the employer complaints we have concluded investigating 13.3% of current employer complaints and 21.5% of previous employer complaints have resulted in a sanction being imposed.
c. In relation to complaints received from third sector employers only, 10.9% of these complaints have resulted in a sanction being imposed.
There are also a small number of cases in which we have made a finding of misconduct or that a worker’s fitness to practise is impaired but not imposed a sanction. Due to the way we record our case outcomes it is not possible to provide a specific number of cases in which this has happened.
3/ How many complaints from either a) members of the public b) third sector c) employers has there been concerning Aberdeen social work children’s service over last 3 years and the percentage of upheld complaints by all three groups?
a. We have received 2 complaints from members of the public and 4 from employers regarding Aberdeen Social Work children’s services.
b. Of the 2 MOP complaints, one has been closed with a finding of no impairment of fitness to practise. Our investigation into the other MOP complaint is still on-going.
c. Of the 4 complaints received from employers, one has resulted in a warning being imposed on the worker’s registration. Our investigations into the other 3 complaints are still on-going.


More proof that they missed vital information or never disclosed it here


« Older Entries