TRUMP FLIP-FLOP
Trump flip-flop is now the all-time biggest flip-flopper ever and its so funny, how can America support such a flip-flop leader.
Trump Flip-Flop
I thought he cleared this all up last week when he said itv was them after all – what have they got on him, we all know what his son said a few years back we make more money from Russia than all other interests put together, was he lying or just another Flip Flop apprentice in the making?
Trump in deep trouble with the Stormy latest, Mr Trump was asked on airforce one “did you know about the payment”? NO he says, is he for real, his body language was all over the place – he thought who is going to find out and besides even if the do my base will just think its fake news as they believe anything I say anyway, not anymore?
Not this time trumpy, Trump in deep trouble he sure is and tonight our contacts are saying its a lot more severe then trumpy could ever have thought theres recorded tapes everywhere in CNN is reporting the same info as we have been told?
Trump knows if International Scotland says something we are always spot on, we were the first blog to say it loud and say it proud that trumpy hates gays and we were right way back http://internationalscotland.com/2016/07/donald-trump-hates-gays/ in 2016 he used to read this site daily as we have had more than our fair share of legal run-ins with him his so-called super doper all singing, all dancing usless web team that cant even w3c validate his websites just makes us laugh!
He tried bully us and took us to WIPO who broke every regulation in their books just to say yes Mr Trump three bags full, anything you say sir!
Trump in deep trouble and even he can’t climb out of the hole he himself has dug and hes an expert hole digger, just ask the then 84 yearold Molly Forbes around 10 years ago, yes he tried to bully her as well?
Then there was last week, we are not going to comment on that other than saying he was caught out lying again with the Sun newspaper, the guy is a Liar, Liar Trumps Pants are on Fire and Trump in deep trouble! yeeha!
Although he loves to be in the news and that poor Mrs Trump, I hope he’s done the right thing and went down on his knees and asked for forgiveness? Your joking, no-way his massive ego would allow such personal weakness or he would have to ask his best bud Vlad to give him a slap special at his next very private meeting in September if hes still in the oval office that is?
Why has the American press not asked the first lady her thoughts on all this begs the biggest question they were never this slow when Mrs Clinton was being asked what poor Monn* was doing under Mr Clintons office desk?
Last night he proved Trump was in Deep Trouble by doing what he always does he comes out with utter rubbish on fake news and blames them for himself making a fool of himself again over Russia, they must be loving this stuff!
Trump in Deep Trouble
TRUMP must own the copyright of FLIP-FLOP as he does it almost every day on all things Russia even they must wonder if this guy is of stable mind?
If Trump is in big trouble then so are all of us including the Russian people, be carefull for what you wish for, lol.
First all goods supplied to UK customers must be;
Goods to be of satisfactory quality
(1)Every contract to supply goods is to be treated as including a term that the quality of the goods is satisfactory.
(2)The quality of goods is satisfactory if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would consider satisfactory, taking account of—
(a)any description of the goods,
(b)the price or other consideration for the goods (if relevant), and
(c)all the other relevant circumstances (see subsection (5)).
(3)The quality of goods includes their state and condition; and the following aspects (among others) are in appropriate cases aspects of the quality of goods—
(a)fitness for all the purposes for which goods of that kind are usually supplied;
(b)appearance and finish;
(c)freedom from minor defects;
(d)safety;
(e)durability.
Then we have another important factor;
Section 11
Goods to be fit for particular purpose!
Section 12
Goods to be as described
(1)Every contract to supply goods by description is to be treated as including a term that the goods will match the description.
(2)If the supply is by sample as well as by description, it is not sufficient that the bulk of the goods matches the sample if the goods do not also match the description.
In what Virgin Media said in writing to the admin of this website after putting his SONY XZ back to Virgin Media’s repair team Unipart the following information that will have SONY going mental.
This was Virgin Media’s head office reply after I sent it back for the 6th time for my XZ overrheating everytime it went back to UNIPART they said FAULT FOUND – WE FIXED IT – just like they said the same thing last week that just happens to be on the same day to the same phone so virgin says no fault, their repairer UNIPART says there was and they fixed it, confused, we all are!
But we can all agree on one thing the camera overheats and unipart agrees there was indeed a fault and they repaired, well no it was all lies, it came back almost as bad as it went, you may have noticed the word prolonged in virgins response well the camera can overheat after 30 seconds and I put up a youtube video of this phone in question here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTuxpGX-OGo that overheats after 3 mins in Scotland the hottest country in the world, not!
This proves the phone is not fit for purpose anyone else got these issues if so please share your story with others on this new and just opened on this weblink for; VIRGIN MEDIA DISPUTE WEBSITE media complaints
Who would have thought it possible that VIRGIN MEDIA would sink so low as to try and rip off customers by only offering the current handset value if any phone should become unrepairable rather than a straight refund or replacement and they want their customers to pay off their remaining credit aggreements!
So in effect Virgin is saying lets forget all about the sale of goods act we decide what your going to get, if anything at all?
For example Virgin could in theory supply a faulty phone and three months later the customer finds out and asks for a refund, the phones mifght be a samsung s9+ at £900 but virgin values are trade in prices which would mean the customer losing over 60% of the handsets price at point of sale?
Who in their right minds would want to purchase a phone on these stupid and scary terms, Virgin handset prices are also well above market prices in general in the first place although their airtime packages are very good value.
Of course if they keep sending your handset away for repair many times they dont care as your still paying off your handset and all the while your phone is losing value?
Look below and see a post seen on virgin medias facebook page this weekend and make up your own mind on how they refund faulty goods and the value they place on customer services.
They are also deleting customer comments that they deem bad news stories for them as their fibre broadband seems to be in meltdown all over the country?
Have you had your facebook posts deleted if you have post your complaints to this new virgin distpute website www.mediacomplaints.co.uk
Virgin Mobile Phone Complaints
Virgin Media has an offshore Customer Services outside the UK and its terrible, complaints are at an all time high, they also have twitter and facebook accounts but these are heavily modderatored and some posts are even removed.
Its very difficult to get a straight answer to even the simplest of enquires so some enterprising webmaster guru has setup their own dispute Virgin Media website to restore the balance and go on them we say.
The website is completely safe just login and tell your story good or bad of Virgin Media Services?
According to the Scottish Government and its partners, the Childrens Hearing system in Scotland is the “Jewel in the Crown” and is a very fair system.
If that is so, why are there 11317 in care in Scotland and not at home? Why are there about another 4000 children under the control of the Childrens Hearing system in Scotland.
Maybe the Scottish Government can explain why number of children in the system jumped by 60% between 2001 ( a few years after they came to power) and 2016?
Is it because just about everything to do with Childrens
Hearings and being taken into care is because the mothers are supposedly responsible for everything and some fathers can walk on water in the eyes of the practitioners of child protection?
Is it because the system only operates on opinion, suspicion and supposition. Evidence is ignored and the whole system works on a theory that “something may happen to a child in the future”?
The level of “evidence” required within the child protection system is lower than for a criminal court. Why is that? If a child is being taken into care should the mother/parents not expect a higher standard as they are in fact being accused of threatening abuse and or negligence towards the children, a criminal offence in Scotland.
When a social worker or a health official applies to a Sheriff for a Child Protection Order to enable them to remove a child from its home, the submission is not made under oath. Why a lower standard of law when a decision is being made to remove a child from its family maybe for a period of up to 18 years?
The system does so much for the children within it that the Children and Young Persons Commissioner for Scotland states on the official web site:-
*Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland***
*Why corporate parenting matters*
*https://www.cypcs.org.uk/policy/corporate-parenting*
Children and young people who are care experienced or looked after have the poorest outcomes of all children and young people in Scotland.Evidence suggests that:
* 50% of the adult prison population were looked after
* 30% of looked after children become homeless
* 50% of looked after children have a mental health issue
* 4% of care leavers go onto higher education
Corporate parenting as a concept exists to try and improve these
outcomes, and to improve the level of respect people have for the rights of care experienced and looked after children and young people.
He fails to state that at least 25% of girls become pregnant by the age of 19 years, 25% are homless between 16 and 25 years of age. Also fails to say that you have a 20 times higher chance of dying by the age of 25 years.
The statistics from the Government show 19% of children now taken into care are under the age of 5 years. 70% of them are adopted, mostly against the wishes of the parents.
A Petition has been lodged with the Scottish Parliaments Public
Petitions Committee calling for an independent QC led investigation in of all aspects of Child Protection in Scotland. Full details of the
Petition plus the transcript of the submission to Petition Committee
can be found at
http://www.parliament.scot/GettingInvolved/Petitions/PE01673. The
Governments response to the Petition can also be read from that link.
Anybody can make a response to the Governments submission by 12th March, 2018, by sending an email to petitions@parliament.scot
If you have found yourself in this mess and no-one else can help you, perhaps you can get help from the Scottish A-Team, Dadscare oremail them at info@dadscare.org.uk
Children’s Panels Not Fit For Purpose, many panel members in recent years has left the service, most panel members that have stayed has an inbuilt bias against parents and a strong belief that social workers can do nothing wrong even if proven to be out and out pork piers,
The other massive problem for most hard pressed parents is the sheer amount of paperwork that comes along with each hearing that even the best solicitors find hard to cope with.
Then we have the biggest headache of all, panel member changes, many panel members don’t turn up on time or if at all, anyone reading this might say so what, well its easy to get another in but they wont be reading the case notes only listening which is no use to man and or beast.
You can request the same panel members yet no-one tells anyone or the parents about this even most solicitors are unaware of these regulations!
Most panel members are terrified to go against SW child plan recommendations in case of something happening afterwards even though there can be severe multiple problems in the look after child’s placement which means in most part they are there to rubber stamp SW teams plans.
The best a parent can hope for if they can prove the social workers are negligent is to get the panel members to agree to order a safe guarders report which loos at both parties and issues damming reports which even then if against SW is an almost complete waste of time.
Social Work only cares about one thing and that’s keeping children in care, some local authorities has such a low return to parent care it seems they have a hidden agenda to not even consider it as an option going forward.
There is big business out there in the form of fostering agencies, its not in their financial interests to have children returned home after long-term placements have broken down so they advice their employees to play dirty and make sure they have the final word to children’s panels to make sure children stay in the system and little chance of returning to the parents by just making it up as they go along, most use it as an excuse for the placement breaking down and no-fault on their parts.
Children’s panels can except any information from any source by-passing the SW team all together, this information is not checked by anyone and can paint a parent as a pedophile without recourse but enough to stain ones character in the eyes of the panel members not to return children to their parents, this must not be allowed to continue and is against natural justice and the parents human rights and then becomes part of the child’s care-first record no matter what!
Most panels don’t read the entire file, in big cases this might take 200+ hours so they only look at snapshots of the latest information which is totally unfair to the children and their parents and SW teams know this and play on it!
The biggest problem with panels is SW abuse of power you easily know if the SW team is in case file trouble they come in mob handed sometimes over 15 different professionals will appear on the day and then totally command the entire proceedings not allowing the parents to question or debate anything with the end result a win for SW.
Most people reading this will say but there’s a children’s reporter there surely not, most reporters are brilliant and stop SW from going to far or doing anything illegal but controlling who speaks next or how long is not one of their jobs?
SW knows the game they do it nearly every day, solicitors are uselessly rubbish in these proceedings.
The main game SW play is breaking the family bonds they do this by keeping the kids in-care for as long as possible and trying everything to stop family contact, this is easier to get the children to think their parents no-longer want them and make the transition into permanency (parents losing their parental rights forever) and the children’s panels is used whether they admit it or not to rubber stamp SW plans to stop contact for some the most bizarre reasons anyone can imagine!
Why does no-one talk about the above, simple, stigma! No one wants to shout SW took my kids away and SW plays on this fact but if any parent wishes to talk about their story we will connect you to the only charity that openly challenges SW abuse, please email admin@internationalscotland.com spammers beware!
WHAT WOULD BE A WAY FORWARD!
In London they are trying a new way, judges take on a case stay with it the entire time and the results are over 70% of children are returned home and stay there this would stop dodgy social workers from making up stories and total fabrications and if nothing else level the playing field for parents and their children.
In Scotland you can appeal decisions but only 3 days afterwards and most decisions are mot substantive but basically 21 day continuance orders which means SW plans are continuing as planned……
WHAT CAN PARENTS DO?
Go to the SW OFFICE OR COMPLAINTS and ask for a SAR subject to access request this details all information on the care first records of your children in care, learn what SW knows but to scared to tell you or children’s panel members!
Children’s Panels Not Fit For Purpose and needs to be more transparent and legally fair and appeals should be judge lead from in house and heard within 7 days!
For whatever reasons ministers have for over protecting the workings of the SSSC are hundreds of Members of the Public are seemingly beeen denied justice and out of over 800 complaints in the last 3 years only 3 have been upheld after Dadscare requested an Freedom of information request.
They also found out there was 2500 complaints by employers for the same period and nearly 17% were upheld which proves the service is not for users of the service but only for the employers, perhaps to get rid of employees without having to pay anything at all?
That works out at 425 upheld complaints, 1 in every 141 member of the public complaints upheld over that of the interests of the employers perhaps the Scottish Government is fully aware of such a terrible stastic and terrified of meeting Dadscare teams face to face?
More info on this thread here~
The Must Go case makes the Aberdeen board look really silly now in their attempts to move to kingswells must now be in serious doubt as they built their entire case on giving Derek McInnes the tools to succeed, well if he goes whats the point of the move at all?
Derek McInnes Must Go because deep down he really wants the rangers job, if that’s not true he should just come out and say so after all he is contracted to Aberdeen for another 3 years and the Aberdeen board should say hes not for sale at any cost but won’t which means, Derek McInnes Must Go!
More on the stupid move away from the current home of the dons here.
He apologised and said his attempts to be “humourous” or “friendly” may have led others to become uncomfortable.
He is one of two SNP members currently being investigated by the party over possible misconduct.
It is understood the allegations against him are not criminal in nature. The other complaint being investigated by the SNP does not relate to a parliamentarian.
In a statement he said: “It has been brought to my attention that some of my previous actions have been considered to be inappropriate – where I have believed myself to have been merely humorous or attempting to be friendly, my behavior might have made others uncomfortable or led them to question my intentions.
“My behavior is entirely my responsibility and I apologise unreservedly to anyone I have upset or who might have found my behavior inappropriate.
“In light of my position in government, I believe it would not be appropriate for me to continue to serve in my role in the Scottish government at this time and I have tendered my resignation as a minister.
“I hope that in taking this step neither any particular woman or my family will be the focus of undue and unwarranted scrutiny.
“It has been an honor to serve in the Scottish government and I will continue to serve my constituents in Aberdeen Donside to the best of my ability.”
Well that’s what he has said but last week he refused to meet one of his constituents who had on-going problems with Aberdeen Social Work claiming he could not meet with them because of his role a Children’s minister.
We understand he also refused to meet the local charity Dadscare who wished to ask him why he refused to meet with them over their FOI request that stated that less than 1% of the 809 members of the public complaints into social services were upheld and 21% of employer complaints were also upheld showing the SSSC as not being fit for purpose of which he has responsibility!